Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Inherent Rights (and wrongs.)

On Facebook, someone posted a venn diagram that determines how conservative you are. It contained concentric circles that define what you think the government's role is. The circles got progressively smaller. I realized, that I was in the smallest circle. Apparently, I'm a minarchist. I hadn't heard that term before so I looked it up on Wikipedia. What I found was that a minarchist is basicly a libertarian. Yeah. That sounds about right. The circle said that the government's job is police force, courts, law, and order. That's the bare minimum. Admittedly, this ought to also include dealing with other countries, but that wasn't on any of the lists. So, we'll assume it's implied. I was tempted to go to the next circle up because it contained fire departments, but I don't even think that's the government's job. That could easily be a private company. Why not simply pay a monthly flat rate that guarantees protection by the fire department? No need for the government to get involved.

As a minarchist, my basis for judging law is whether it comes down to a matter of faith, or a matter of life and property. I personally believe that the government's job is not to define morality for its citizens, but to protect its citizens. This means, giving them the right to do as they please as long as they are not infringing on another's rights. Such as if one wanted to smoke weed. My assessment would be this; I personally don't think they should be doing it. It's wrong. (UPDATE: This does not include medicinal marijuana. I see no problem with a doctor prescribing it for medicinal purposes.) However, in a free society they should be allowed to do it and suffer the consequences of their actions. Ultimately, every man will answer to God for his actions. Now, if he were to go out and drive high, that I would have a problem with. At that point, he is a danger to others and is violating their rights to life and property.
This is not to say that there isn't an all encompassing morality that every man is bound by. My point is that it should be binding upon a man not because the government says so, but because of his own conscience. Laws do not change men's hearts. The Lord does. For there to be true morality, God's law has to penetrate to the core of a man. This is the role of the church and the Gospel - to change men's hearts. If the government's goal in outlawing weed, tobacco, alcohol, pornography, video games, etc, is to change men's hearts, then it is usurping the role of the church. The State's job is not to spread the Gospel but to provide a stage whereby God can bring about His plan of redemption. In short, if the State is stepping in to legislate morality, then the church is falling down on the job. I want to reiterate that by morality here, I mean, things that are personal lifestyle choices, moral or immoral, that do not infringe on other's rights to life and property. Things such as homosexuality. In no way am I saying these things are good and wholesome. Quite the contrary. It is the condition of man that sin has pervaded every part of his being and a pragmatic approach to politics needs to understand that. How can we expect the non-Christians in our land to act like Christians if God has not changed them? In a country with such diverse people groups, it's simply not feasible to enforce a single morality on a widely varied population. Why are we causing them resentment by legislating their lives? Instead, we should be reaching out and praying for them. Preach the Gospel and pray for God's healing on their hearts. THAT is what truly transforms someone's morals. No law in the world can what God does.
I'd also like to briefly address the topic of abortion. Many libertarians are pro-choice (pro-murder, in more accurate terms) because they feel it is a matter of personal liberty. If you consider it however, abortion violates a child's right to life. That is a human being who has inherent worth and has a right to life. It is not in the same category as fornication. It's murder. And murder must always be against the law because it is the most fundamental evil that the State is in place to combat. I just wanted to diffuse that potentially volatile situation.

In short, the government needs to stay in it's place. That is, it must guard and serve it's people's inherent rights, but no more. The Church's job is to change hearts. That's the mission of the Church because it is the visible manifestation of Christ's kingdom. Christ came to redeem a people and conform them to his image. He doesn't accomplish this by a government, but by his work on the cross. The Church, permeated by the Holy Spirit, is how Christ applies this work and it's benefits to mankind.

God Bless,
Stanley

3 comments:

  1. That is a very interesting article.
    It is a sad fact that many unbelievers, homosexuals especially, hates the Church because it spends it time condemning the sin without the proper teaching of God's love and faith in Christ for an inner heart change.
    But the duty of the State to act against crime is fully supported in Romans chapter 13 where it says that the officer does not bear his sword for nothing, but to keep evil in check.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good post Stanley. You wrote: "This means, giving them the right to do as they please as long as they are not infringing on another's rights." That about sums up the situation for me too. With freedom must come responsibility; I suppose if we are not harming someone else by our actions, except perhaps our standing with God, for the most part we will get along in life, with other people anyway.

    For a Christian however, I believe when we actively serve God, He holds us to stricter rules if you like, that we can't just do what we like any old time, because quite simply we are not living for ourselves but for the Lord. Smoking pot profusely or getting drunk might not harm anybody else, but for the Christian it won't help us in our walk with God. Whether it's technically sinful to get stoned or get roaring drunk I can't personally say, but it seems that God is not best served by His followers doing such things.

    Great post, and much food for thought!

    ReplyDelete
  3. My church has been going through a really interesting book that talks on this subject. It's titled "Living in God's Two Kingdoms" by David Van Drunen. His basic thesis is that God has established two different kingdoms that men fall into. These two kingdoms are the common kingdom and the special kingdom (the church). The common kingdom is established under the covenant with Adam and the covenant with Noah. This covenant encompasses all men and is the foundation of human civilization. The dominion of man over nature, marriage, government, and the stability of reality are all established in these covenants. The point is that this kingdom is one that both Christians and non-Christians interact within. We all engage in similar cultural activities.
    Yet, God has also established a second kingdom that He will use to claim His people. This kingdom began with the Abrahamic covenant and continued straight through to the covenant with Christ. This is the foundation for the church. This speaks to what you were saying, T-Childs. God has a special ethic and morality that He has bound His people. This influences how we interact with the world immensely.

    This is largely where I am coming from. The common kingdom encompasses the government and is thus a function of both Christians and non-Christians. In order for us to live in harmony, every man must be guaranteed his freedom. Then, through God's special kingdom, He will claim and transform the hearts of His people. Not strong arming non-Christians into acting like something they aren't.

    Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete