Tuesday, January 31, 2012

This is True Pathos

I recently acquired an air mail envelope. This envelope was addressed to Congressman Harry L. Englebright from a man by the name of Warren N. Woodson. Combined with the fact that it's dated 1938, that's cool. But the best part? Mr. Woodson typed his message on the outside. I think you need to read it.

"With daring and glory, rides tragedy and pathos. Think you not? Then read the record of a dying pilot. Captain Pearson, world war flyer and mail pilot, mortally wounded in a wreck, in the mountains of Pennsylvania, alone, and conscious that life was fast ebbing away, upon his log book penned these, his last lines--"

"My beloved brothers, pilots and Pals: I go west, but with a cheerful heart. I hope that what small sacrifice I have made may be of use to the cause. When we fly we are fools, they say. When we are dead we weren't half bad fellows, they say. But, every one in this wonderful aviation service is doing the world far more good than the public can possibly appreciate. We risk our necks; we give our lives; we perfect a service for the world at large. They, mind you, are the one who call us fools. But, stick to it boys. I am still very much with you. See you all again."

"To me, these final words of a dying air hero is pathos, indeed; yet glorious in their expression of fidelity, loyalty, and devotion to a cause and a principle to which this hero dedicated his life. A classic in aeronautical literature, I think. ~ Warren N. Woodson 5/19 1938"

Please, re-read it. It needs to be read over and over. What beauty! What a passionate plea! This is truly an amazing piece of history. I'm humbled to have it.

God Bless,
Stanley





Many Ways Up The Same Mountain? More Like Many Ways Off The Same Cliff...

Have you ever heard this phrase? "All religions are different ways up the same mountain." How about the idea that "God is too great to be contained by one religion."? Somehow, this nonsensical idea is held by some. It's utterly absurd. Every religion is completely antithetical to all the others! That's like saying that every different color is all the same color. Honestly, it's not hard to see the logical problems with this theory. The motivation behind believing this is quite interesting though. If God is too great to be contained by any religion, why do I need religion? Why do I need God? Who has need for a God who is silent and useless? I have no idea what He wants me to do and I have no idea who He is. Bingo! Through pious trickery, they have effectively eliminated God. Isn't that convenient? Here's how: If all religions are equal, then they're all worthless. They can't ALL be right. Through some miracle, let's pretend that all religions do somehow capture a small piece of God. How would one tell truth from fiction? God would be an amalgam of impossible ideas! God would be unknowable. If God can't be known, we don't need to worry about him! This isn't the case though. God HAS revealed Himself. Jesus Christ is the full manifestation of God's revelation. God has spoken to us in the Bible. God requires us to do things. Jesus says that if we love him, we will keep his commandments. Boom. That's the end of it. You can't somehow find God by following anyone else. There is no other name given among men by which we can be saved! Because God has spoken to us and revealed Himself to us in Christ, we can know truth. This is possible because God is a a real and personal God. A God of creativity, communication, and order. He's so totally unlike any other god in any other religion. It's impossible to call Christianity the other side of the same coin because Christianity is at a fundamental dichotomy to every other religion on earth. Next time someone tries to pass this idea off on you, try to pin them down. Show them the implications of what they're saying. By God's grace, they will flee this absurd and yet incredibly dangerous philosophy!

God Bless,
Stanley

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Yes, the Words Matter.

Ok, so the Trinity. God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are all parts of one whole right? The apple analogy. Yeah, we've heard it. Here's the thing. The words actually matter. Neither the egg, nor the water, nor the apple analogy are gonna cut it. They're wrong. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are not all parts of God. They are all equally God. One in substance, power, and being. There really is no analogy for this because it's beyond human comprehension. We must simply be satisfied with very precise language. And the language matters! Just because you're splitting hairs, doesn't mean the hairs don't need to be split! Working with a doctrine as complex as the Trinity is precise work. It's easy to say, "Well, that's simple enough and we'll call it good." Nope. That's not good enough. Consider language as your scalpel. We are performing surgery. It matters whether you say separate vs. distinct. It matters if you say of one essence vs. of like essence. It matters whether the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father AND the Son vs. just the Father. Boiling it down to an analogy will destroy it and the language must be precise. Yes, I'm being nit-picky. Guess what, there couldn't be bigger stakes! The very nature of God is on the line. Don't you think that warrants some work and some specifics? Close enough is not good enough when it comes to who God is.

God Bless,
Stanley

Saturday, January 28, 2012

An Open Mind? Oh. You Mean No Absolutes.

You've probably met this person before. They're the intellectual. The seeker. The one that calls himself "open minded." There's that phrase! "Why can't you Christians be more open minded?" "I don't judge. I'm a very open minded individual." I see. So basically, no commitments. Is that it? Yep, that's pretty much it. You see, no matter how impressive it sounds when someone says that they're searching for truth and that they have an open mind, it's simply a lie. No human being has an open mind. That's a fact. Everyone brings their own worldview and experiences to a question of truth. More importantly, everyone brings sin. This is the blinding factor. No matter how many coats of paint you give a tomb, it's still a tomb. What I'm trying to get across is that no human being is objective. You can delude yourself into believing you are, but you're not. And isn't it funny how being "objective" always leads to a rejection of Christianity? That's because it's not true objectivity. True objectivity never fails to brings us to Christ! In that moment when God quickens our dead soul, our eyes are blessed with true objectivity. Without variance, we choose Christ! It's like this. Picture a man who is bound by chains and cast into the ocean. If his chains were removed, were would he go? Towards life! This is man. Man is bound by sin. He's up a creek without a paddle. God removes our bonds and in that moment, man truly has an objective choice. Of course, he chooses to live! But men who have not been freed are trying to act like they have a chance at life when they don't have squat! Open mindedness is such a lovely delusion isn't it?
Have you ever noticed how people use the phrase "open minded?"It's always to describe themselves. It makes them feel better. They don't judge gays. They let women kill their children. They're pretty pious. But, ugh! Those narrow minded Christians with their rules and absolutes! Why can't they just get along with others? Open minded means "I have no morals/absolutes to judge the universe with. I'm so loving to others!" As a Christian, God has revealed the true nature of reality. God has also bound man by morals. This is absolute. There's no two ways about it! It's not absolute unless you feel otherwise. People who break God's law or deny the reality He created are wrong. It's as simple as that. There's no "Oh, it's true for them." That's absurd! Frankly, if open minded means "no absolutes" then I'm proud to be narrow minded! When you open your mind too far, anything can find its way in. Anything.

God Bless,
Stanley

Sunday, January 22, 2012

John 3:16? Yeah, I Don't Really Have a Problem With That.

Ah, yes. John 3:16. It's verse that every Christian child knows by heart. It's also the verse that, because of familiarity, we brush past and fail to understand it's meaning. We've heard it too many times. This is sad because, in many ways, John 3:16 is an incredibly useful tool. John 3:16 is the basic preaching of the Gospel. It's succinct yet it tells the whole story. However, many universalists like to throw it at Calvinists and say that it disproves the doctrine of Specific Atonement. Guess what. I don't have a problem with John 3:16. It doesn't conflict with my beliefs at all. A combination of a couple of other doctrines explain this verse very nicely. First, let's look at the actual verse.

John 3:16
“For God so loved the world,that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (emphasis added by me.)

Well there you have it! "God so loved the world!" Woah. Slow down. Yes, I agree that's what it says. God so loved the world. I'm totally onboard with that. Now, look at who it says He saves. He doesn't save the whole world. He saves "whoever believes in him." Again this may seem problematic. Whoever means anybody! Yes it does. I still agree with this statement though. Anyone who believes on Christ will be saved. Without variance. Yet, not just anyone can come to Christ! Man is dead in sin. Man can't initiate salvation. God must reach down and quicken a soul before it can turn to Him. In eternity past, God loved and chose each soul that He would regenerate. These are the elect. According to the doctrine of Specific Atonement, Christ died for the sins of his elect. This is totally consistent with John 3:16. Christ paid for the sins of everyone who believes on him. This what is so unique about Specific Atonement. It enables Christ's sacrifice to be perfectly sufficient for everyone he died for. Not simply effective only for those who choose to grasp a hold of it. Christ accomplished his mission. Universalism, at it's heart, denies man's sin nature and God's sovereignty. I hope that any Calvinists out there who were afraid of John 3:16 can now see that it is a beautiful verse that Universalists have stolen from us. Let's take it back. After all, it's the Gospel at stake. What larger stakes can there be?

God Bless,
Stanley

Thursday, January 19, 2012

A Vacuum With Nothing To Fill It

This is my story that I'm entering into the ACSI Writing Contest. See if you can pick out the philosophical point of the story.

A Vacuum With Nothing To Fill It

By Matthew Stanley

Inspired by the painting Alone in the World by Josef Israels

Foot to the shovel. Foot to the shovel. With each stroke the shovel resurrects dirt laid at the foundation of the earth. Never moving. Now it must move to serve its purpose. This is no mere dirt. This is no mere hole. This is a grave. The man digging this grave is an old man. His crooked back groans under his burden and his rough hands grip an ancient shovel. An excavation is taking place in the churchyard. The old man is its lone participant. Only the ravens watch him from the trees. They dare not caw for fear of breaking the holy silence. For years, they have been his only company as he has dug grave after grave. All the large oak trees have grown from frail saplings to pillars of strength before his eyes. The mighty forest wraps its arms around the country church and the cemetery. The stones of the church tower have become weathered and cracked from age. The old man sighs in weariness as he remembers the day that chapel reached completion. His memory fails him as he attempts to recall the interior of the building. He has watched as the graveyard has slowly filled itself. With cold and mechanical motion, he has dug every barrow.

But, a man cannot live without hope. He may eat and breathe, but life has fled his body if he is without hope. Laying in the yard is the hope of many people, but his hope lay elsewhere. His hope drew breath. As a young man, he had returned each day to the hovel he called home. There, waiting for him, was his hope. Each evening he lit a small candle and gazed at the magnificent face of his hope as she blushed in it’s glow. Each night he lay beside her in bed as she slumbered without care. The drab olive blanket scratched him and did not cover his feet. It still covered hers though. That was enough.

The years rolled over their heads. Daily, he came home to his hope and daily his hope revived his soul. Once they watched the revelry of nature. Once, they partook in its bacchanalian celebration of life. Now, her age prevents her. She no longer leaves the house. Its four blackened walls are her cell. Within her cell, a bed. There she lies all her days. Waiting. Wishing. Breathing one breath at a time. As she hears the scrape of the old man’s boots down the lane, her body cries out in pain as she sits up in bed. He must not know how bad it is. So as the old man hobbles into the shack, aching from his labors, she smiles at him. This is what he lives for. Each grinding day is forgotten in the subtlety and beauty of her smile. She is the reason that he rises each morning, the reason he digs ditches all day long, and the reason he draws each breath. How could she take that away from him? Her body is broken. She musters every ounce of strength within herself and put herself together each day. All for the old man.

The charade could not last. Simply put, death wrote his signature upon her face. There was no hiding it. First, it was a tiny cough. Then, a seemingly insignificant bloodstain on the blanket. Soon the coughs came more frequently. They were longer. They were deeper. They were accompanied by copious amounts of blood. The writing was upon the wall. But, the old man refused to see it. His desperate grasping for meaning left him blind.

The thick fog of gloom pervaded the old man’s brain that day. Finding it’s way into every crack. Every thought. His mind was choked with sorrow as he dragged his weary body home that day. A dog barked. He ignored it. The long unpaved road stretched out before him. At the farthest end of the lane sat a dilapidated building. The old man hobbled down the lane towards that building for the millionth time. Turning into the yard, things were strangely silent. The birds had stopped. An unholy stillness pervaded the air. The only sound was the crunch of dead grass beneath his feet. It appeared as though the entirety of nature was holding its breath. He tripped over a small stone but caught himself. His heart skipped a beat. By some miracle, it resumed its clockwork. He continued up the walk. Hand on the knob. Turn. The hinges of the ancient door emit a high pitch note in sharp contrast with the low creak produced by stepping into the house. His eyes never waver for a moment as he enters. They are fixed upon his hope’s bed.

What meets his eyes is an image he had seen before, but has always pushed away. It had been crammed back in the recesses of his brain. Somehow, it had extricated itself from his mind and become a reality before his eyes. Yet, what washed over him was a feeling that he never could have comprehended before now. This image was infinitely more vile and abhorrent to him than the one that had once been lodged in his skull. No man can endure the endless grinding of the millstone of time. The old man’s bones were ground to powder by its ceaseless motion. Now he could not lie to himself. The gravity of the situation pierced through the old man’s blindness. As a veil being rent in two, the world in true color stood arrayed before him. Death’s axe had finally chopped through the old man’s very foundation. The demise of not just one soul, but two. The second soul being a mere casualty.

All the while, his feet had remained unmoved. Now, the nails were removed from them. Mechanically, he draws up his only chair to sit beside her deathbed. In utter stupor, the old man relinquishes the job of supporting himself to the chair. In its finest moment, the chair held the man. The chair existed for the sole purpose to hold the old man in his darkest hour.

Time slowed down in that room. Every other thing in the world melted away. What slowly crept upon the man was a feeling. An emotion. Yet, it somehow could not register. The pure despair that slowly seeped into the cracks that were forming in his soul began to freeze and rip it apart. A wedge was driven into his heart. Under the force, it shattered into a multitude of shards. One single tear emerged from his tear glands and snaked its way down his cheek before plummeting to the floor and pooling amongst the dust. This tear was followed by a flood. This old man, who has been daily beaten low by life and yet continues to stare it in the eye, wavers. He blinks. He surrenders. Death has deprived this man of his only possession of value. The riches of the earth stand arrayed as dross before his eyes. He buries his face in his hands as he daily buries caskets within the earth. There is not one soul in the universe to share his burden. Blindly, he reaches out into eternity in a vain attempt to grasp a hold of something. Anything. As a noiseless and patient spider, he casts his string into infinity but finds nothing.

He vainly attempts to stand but his legs give way beneath him and he falls to his knees. There he kneels before a cracked and blackened wall. He beats it until his hands bleed. He cries out loudly until he is hoarse. With his head laid low, he cries one last tear before collapsing in exhaustion.

As his frail frame lies upon the cold ground, he contemplates existence. The old man was never much of a philosopher. He was a worker. However, his hope’s death had pulled things into perspective. In tragedy, every man becomes a philosopher. The meaningless of existence slowly wrapped itself around his frozen limbs. His chest seized up as his own life came into view. He had only been a drop in the ocean of existence. Yet, had he even been a drop? His eyelids slowly shut as his mind became dull with the anesthesia of sleep.

Eyes open. Back to reality. The old man’s temples throbbed as he awoke. He closed his eyes again and reopened them in hope that yesterday was a dream. A nightmare. When he reopened his eyes, the same sad shack met them and his hope lay in the exact place he had found her. His soul is crushed once again in the face of cruel reality. Her body still lay in the bed and scabs were forming upon his hands. He clenched them in fury but he knew not what to do.

Suddenly, horror grips him as he remembers his occupation. The irony of Death laughed him to scorn as he once again collapsed in tears. He cries out for Death! He counts Death a friend! But Death is not kind enough to grant his request. With his lungs collapsed within him, the old man walks the gravel road to the churchyard. Each step is agony. Life is abhorrent to him! Why does Death suffer him to languish in the realm of the Living? These thoughts course through his brain as he slowly opens the gate to the cemetery. Its crash rouses the birds to scatter. The army of tombstones loom all around him. A feeling of belonging begins to creep over the old man. Here he was in the kingdom of the dead and here he stood as a man who had found his place. The soft moss was flattened under his boot as he patiently weaves amongst the grave markers. His eyes pass over every soft patch of earth. He meticulously analyzes which patch of ground would be suitable to bear the honor of housing his hope’s corpse for eternity. Soon he comes upon a plot overshadowed by a large willow tree. Descending now into delirium, the old man could imagine that he heard a voice. It almost sounded like his hope’s voice! It tells him that this is the place.

That voice promptly vanished. Silence descended like a sheet. One could hardly think. The intense knot of emotions within the old man’s chest tightens, relaxes, and seizes up over and over as he dug her grave. The shovel excavates small portions of dirt with each motion but for the old man, the end of the job was too close. He wished he could refill the hole and start again just so it didn’t have to end. The end arrived in spite of the old man’s delay. At last, the gaping chasm stares him in the face. Straining his ears, the old man could just here Death’s scornful laughter rising up from the abode of the dead. It echoes and reverberates through the old man’s mind. Death was what he longed for, but did Death long for him? Perhaps Death’s hatred was of such vehemence, that it would elect to torture him with everlasting life. Such a thing could never be. Could it? But surely Death’s wickedness springs forth eternally.

His heavy heart resided within his boots as he returned to his broken down house. The strain of the physical and emotional deterioration causes the walk to become somewhat of a dream. Even when he thinks he it is over, his legs carry him on. He again returned to the charred cell. The way he removed his hope’s body from the bed, one would think she was made of glass. She was the most precious thing to him. Now, he had to wheel her through the streets. His mind entered a tunnel with that plot of land at the other side. No street or hill was a match for him. The old man was the only participant in his hope’s final funeral procession through the street. By the light of the morning sun, the old man cast long shadows down the lane. Shafts of light dance around him, but they are grey. The world had lost its color. His mind was hardly aware of this though. His only thought was the plot beneath the willow.

Beneath the willow, the heavy smell of fresh soil fills the man’s nostrils as he tenderly touches his hope’s pale cheek. He savors every moment. But his task at hand violently intrudes his thoughts and reminds him of its existence. His ancient muscles cry out in agony as he places her within the hole. He doesn’t want to relinquish her. It can’t end this way! The wind takes life and swirls about him singing, “Oh, but it can!” Dehydration prevents the old man from shedding another tear so he simply closes his eyes and breathes. The cold forest air enters and exits his lungs in rhythm. He frowns. Yes. It has lost it’s magic. He cannot rip his eyes away from the final view of his hope. Now his hope lay with the others’ hope. Each shovel of dirt pains him to the core of his being as he slowly fills the hole. Her grave is left unmarked for the old man is too poor to afford a tombstone. Her only monument is the willow tree.

It was the first day of the rest of his… life? No, it wasn’t a life. It was less a life and more the absence of death. Death had spread like a disease and infected every aspect of his world and thought. Every joy was dull. Every beauty was corrupted. Somehow, Death had crossed over his metaphysical bounds and had invaded the material world. The old man passed through the village in a trance. Physical existence hardly registered in his shattered mind. He was conscious of standing once again in the dead yard of the ruined shelter. It wasn’t a home anymore. Whereas it had once been his wife’s cell, now it was his. The old man submitted to his sentence and crossed over the threshold. The sensation of stepping into a state of purgatory swept over him. He thought he could hear the cries of the tormented. He wanted to be among that number. And as he closed the door to his cell, he thought he could hear Death sealing it tight.

Sorry about the weird formatting at the end. It's unexplainable. There is a coffee shop near my school called "Shady Coffee." Each Friday night they have an open mic night. Their flyer says "Art, music, and poetry welcome." I would really like to go read my story. Let me know what you think!

God Bless,
Stanley

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Mommy, Why Do My Friends Get Cool Toys?

Inevitably, a child will ask his/her parents this question. When a young child lives in a society that is composed of a wide spectrum of people, they will invariably find someone who is better off than they are. Yet, sometimes, these people are peers. This causes the child to wonder what could cause such a significant rift between them and their peers? The short answer is: money. When their friends have iPhones and laptops, how is a child going to react when they ask for them and their parents say that they can't afford them? Or even, that they have other priorities for their money? This is a problem that is prevalent in Christian homes and poverty is not the primary cause. The root is investing in the Kingdom of God.
Everything that a Christian owns is given to them by God. It's God's property. That is why we don't withhold it when God mercifully asks for only 10%. Now, this 10% is a sizable amount of money though. Let's do some math. Say that a man earns $60,000 a year for his family. This means that he gives $6,000 a year to the church. That's two nice vacations right there! Christians families could sure have a lot more vacations, electronics, and new cars if they didn't give this money. But they do and they do because it's valuable. They are investing in eternity! The money that goes to the church goes to keeping the church going, missions, and providing for you pastor! These are the chief ways that tithing benefits the Kingdom of God. However, every action ripples and has far reaching effects. The point is, God uses what we give. We give it because it's a worthwhile investment! There is no greater return than the one from received by investing in God's Kingdom. So, next time you consider why you don't have that new iPhone or cool car, remember that your money is doing things that are far more valuable. You are laying up treasure where neither moth nor rust can destroy.

God Bless,
Stanley

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Specific Atonement 2: The Return of Specific Atonement!

As promised, I want to return to the topic of specific atonement. I specifically (punny) want to focus on the covenantal aspect of specific atonement. Paul says "For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." This is only one of the many passages that draw parallels between Christ and Adam. Christ is the second Adam and thus is a covenant representative. We know that Adam was the covenantal representative of every man, woman, and child to ever live. When he failed in his task and sinned, death came to every one. Did they have a choice about it? No. It came, without variance, to everyone he represented. Let's take this and apply it to Christ and his covenant. If Christ covenantally represented every man in his sacrifice on the cross, every man would be saved. That's simply how covenants work. It's a syllogism. Basic logic. Covenants aren't somehow optional. They can't simply be ignored. Just try ignoring the effects of Adam's Fall.
Now, I realize that some may raise the objection, "Yes, but we need faith to participate in that covenant and become those whom he has represented." That may sound logical, but covenants don't work that way. No covenant that God ever made with His people was that ambiguous. Covenants have objects. They have a special people. When Christ died on the cross, he had his elect in his mind. He wasn't contemplating a vague concept of humanity. He had you and me on his mind. In short, covenants do not operate in ambiguity, but in specifics.
The New England Primer says, "In Adam's fall, we sinned all." Logically it should be, "In Christ's death, we all receive breath." This is clearly not the case. A covenantal perspective of what is actually happening in the story of redemption and of the inner workings of salvation is incompatible with what universalists believe. Covenants are not so soft as to be rejected or somehow be cast aside. That's simply not how they work.

God Bless,
Stanley

P.S. I have been really into this song called "Shekinah" by Saving Grace. They are a metal band from New Zealand. These dudes are on fire for God! I posted the lyrics here in this post, but I'm also posting a link to the song.
...as in the days of old the Glory fills the temple of the Lord
We are your temple
We are your temple

This burning deep inside of my heart
These lips adorned with praise
My hands raised in worship lost
In the wonder of your ways

Come now and take your place Lord
Bring forth new winds of change
Set our lives ablaze with fire
Bring down your Heavenly rain


We are your temple...

Bring away the darkness of sin
Fill these hands with seeds of truth
Show the path and I will follow
Let your Spirit lead me through

This hunger taking over my life
This thirst for Heavenly ways
These eyes are filled with visions
This heart your dwelling place

Come reign here Holy Spirit
Bring forth a storm of change
Set our tongues ablaze with fire
Bring down your Heavenly Glory, Glory

You made these hands
Now take these hands
Lord fill these hands
Lord fill these hands with seeds of truth

Bring your fire down!
Glory
Fire
Power
Shekinah

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA2giDLtZ_Y

UPDATE: Why I Love Religion AND Jesus

I was reading White Horse Inn's blog this morning and they had a post on this exact subject. It was short, but they put a 13 minute video at the end. It's made by a Lutheran, but he goes through and line by line refutes the "Why I Hate Religion and Love Jesus" video. It's incredibly well done so I decided to post it below. (Keep in mind he IS a Lutheran.)

http://youtu.be/TbsadOQK_6A

I think the best part about the video is that he points out that while this man is teaching the Gospel, he is destroying it's foundation in the process. That's the heart of the problem. Christ said that "if you love me, you will keep my commandments." Without the church, fellowship, teaching, and doctrine, then how do you follow Christ's commandments? You are left with an undefined, personal journey and that is not the whole picture that the Bible paints.

God Bless,
Stanley

Friday, January 13, 2012

Stop Stealing My Philosophy! You've Got Your Own...

Too many people borrow Christian philosophy without knowing it. Whenever someone says, "That's not fair!" or "That was mean," or "You owe me this," they have just stolen Christian principles. They have no foundation for saying any of these things and the fact that they do say them is a testament to their inconsistency. They can't live like an atheist. No one can. Any consistent atheist would commit suicide. However, man was designed with worth, morals, and a desire to fellowship with God. That's all built in and it can't be escaped. This is something that non-Christians take for granted. Their default mode is the way God made them and so they fall into acting on those principles, but if you asked them, they'd outright deny the principles. This can be clearly seen in politics. People rage when their rights are "infringed." Guess what, if the State gives you your rights, they can sure as heck take them away! But if God gives you your rights, then they can't be infringed. Oh. Wait. You don't believe in God... fail. The government owes no man any rights or any fairness. Yet, when they act like they do, it's because they're accidently operating in reality (crazy, huh?). There can be no liberty apart from the foundation of Christianity. Sure, God never says in the Bible that "Thou shalt give the people the right to speak freely," but that right can never be demanded or upheld without the Bible. A short summary of my point here is that God never guaranteed the right to free speech, but you can't have free speech apart from God.

God Bless,
Stanley

Thursday, January 12, 2012

I Love Religion AND Jesus. Yep.

Have you seen this video floating around? You know, the one called "Why I Hate Religion but Love Jesus." Please watch it to track with this post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IAhDGYlpqY

So. What's your first impression? Tears? Amens? Bad rhyming? :P lol It's ok. I really appreciate the good things that this guy has to say. His words on the topic of Christ's sacrifice and justification by faith are really spot on and also incredibly moving. But, fundamentally, this dude is flawed. There is an obvious reason and then a not so obvious reason. The obvious reason is that believing in Christ and doing His will IS a religion. It's called Christianity. You can't hate religion and love Christ. One is the natural outcome of the other and they must be taken together. You know one thing that I can't stand? "Christianity is a relationship, not a religion." Now, with every cliche like this, there is a kernel of truth, but the way it is used today is so infuriating, I refuse to defend it any longer. Christianity is a religion. Christ came to earth to free His people by His sacrifice and to establish His church! The Bible says that The Church is the Bride of Christ. James writes that pure religion consists of... and he lists taking care of the poor and staying unstained from the world. Of course, James proceeds to also write an entire book on the subject. He talks about going to church and also about elders. Jesus says that he did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. Jesus does NOT hate religion. If you told me that, I would ask you to go to the Bible and prove it to me.
The slightly less obvious reason is that he is lumping religion and false religion together. In the book of James, James speaks at length about dead faith and false religion. I recommend that this poet read the book of James. Clearly, a religion that is based on works and on dead faith is destructive and wicked. However, Christ has established a true and beautiful religion. Yes, it is composed of sinners, but there is power among us and The Holy Spirit is actively changing us. It's not religion's fault that we are a bunch of immoral fakers. It's our fault. Christ established the Church and we have perverted it. This is a clear truth. I don't deny it. However, just because sinners have corrupted the Church, that doesn't mean that Jesus hates religion or that there isn't a Pure Religion. The Holy Spirit is daily sanctifying us so that we can attain that pure religion that Christ established and actively upholds. To say that Christ hates religion is a blatant falsehood.
Now, I want to clarify. This poet clearly has his heart in the right place. If he truly believes what he's saying about Christ's sacrifice and justification, I know I'll be seeing him in Heaven someday. But, he has been caught up in the modern notion that religion is evil and he is spreading this idea rapidly with the talent that God has given him. I pray that he sees the error of his ways. Until then, I will still count him a brother in Christ.

God Bless,
Stanley

P.S. I really enjoyed this guy's spoken word response. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlhoTOhXm7c&feature=related

Friday, January 6, 2012

Limited Atonement? I prefer Specific Atonement.

I've decided to begin a brief series on the topic of "Limited Atonement" aka, the "L" in TULIP. I honestly don't like that label. How did we Calvinists let the other side define us? That's simply unacceptable. Letting the other side brand your idea is deadly. To try to portray "limited atonement" as limiting God or Christ's sacrifice, well, that's just a smart move by it's opponents. Throughout this article I will use the term "specific atonement" to refer to limited atonement. I think that specific atonement accurately portrays the idea that is being represented. Because the core of specific atonement is God's election and plan for salvation. This doctrine is the logical outcome of God's sovereign plan of salvation. The object of God's plan of salvation is directed towards His elect. The doctrines of God's sovereignty and election form the foundation of specific atonement. Let's consider this from a negative view point. What would a universal atonement view do to God and Christ's sacrifice?
How could a God be sovereign and yet finite men reject His payment for their sins? How can a sovereign God have His Son pay for someone's sins and then that person must pay them off again? Can God be sovereign if He simply waits idly by waiting for men to decide to choose Him or not? God offers the contract and desperately hopes we decide to sign on the dotted line, right? What kind of a God is that? Clearly he is not only a weak god but also an unjust one. This simply flies in the face of what we know about God and His nature. God's love has an intimate and personal object. Those are His elect. The wonder of His salvation is that He personally pays for and applies it to each one. To limit the scope of Christ's sacrifice is not to weaken it, on the contrary, it is all the more powerful! Christ's sacrifice is holy and perfect for every single person He died for. That's the wonder and beauty of it! Yet, what use do we have for a Christ who sufferings are effectual for only a few and rejected by a multitude? Certainly He is not worthy of the title of Almighty God! I hope this brings things into perspective. God's holiness, justice, and sovereignty demands an all sufficient sacrifice and a universal atonement view of Christ's sufferings simply cannot provide that. Next post I would like to address this from a covenantal perspective.

God Bless,
Stanley

P.S. Thanks for reading my ramblings!

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The Political Implications of the Incarnation

This is a short paper I wrote for Systematics class. It's about the political implications of having a Chalcedonian understanding of Christ. Read "Foundations of Social Order" by R. J. Rushdoony for more information on the subject.

The incarnation, also called the Hyptostatic Union, is the most monumental event of History. The God and creator of the universe stooped to eternally unite Himself with a human nature and body. In this union, Christ’s divine nature is neither diminished nor is his humanity incomplete. His two natures are not mixed together. His natures are distinct but not separate. His body is real and physical. The early church fought long and hard to define and preserve this core doctrine. They had good reason to do so! The incarnation is not only pivotal to Christianity but also to Western Liberty.

With the appearance of God on earth as a man, there are some potential pitfalls that sinful men would like to fall into. One could assert that Jesus is merely God putting on a façade. This makes Christ’s work ineffective and has a profound effect on how we interact with the physical universe. If the matter is evil, what hope do we have for salvation? Is our God an OCD germaphobe too afraid to intervene on behalf of His people? This makes God distant and impersonal. The role of God being left empty, the state gladly steps in to fill it. If God cannot save us, only our collective volition (the state) can.

Perhaps I want to entirely deny Christ’s divinity? Well, now Christ is merely a righteous man. How about Christ is a good man who was inhabited by Christ’s spirit? These both lead us to conclude that we can attain equal or greater status with Christ. However, if Christ is only a man, why cannot other men be worshipped? The State can easily force it’s way into the role of a divine institution full of righteous Jesus level men. This too, is incredibly dangerous and men of all political stripes have used this for ages. The divine right of kings and the doctrine of ex cathedra concerning popes are just two pervasive and dangerous ideas that flowed logically from this belief. This doctrine gives a ruler divine fiat to run amok without accountability or opposition. These doctrines, called Arianism and Nestorianism, are detestable errors that have disastrous consequences. Sinful men cannot be allowed to do as they please without opposition. Christianity provides a foundation for the distrust of human rulers.

With a proper understanding of the Incarnation, we put the government in it’s proper role in society. In a world without God, the hierarchy of the universe is corrupted. Without a God to save us, who will? This creates a divine vacuum that the State will gladly fill. Statism is the logical end of a denial of Chalcedonian Christology. However, once you understand the true transcendent and human nature of the Savior, the State is put in it’s proper place. God provides a divine savior and yet, one who can sympathize with our infirmities. Since God has provided a savior, the State need not fill that role. Indeed, it cannot and should not. It was designed and instituted by God and is thus valuable, but being our savior is not it’s function. Our collective reason and volition cannot provide salvation. When Christ is a man, he is our savior. When Christ is God, the state is not.

God Bless,

Stanley